Ironically India got freedom from muslims in 2014. Before that India was being ruled by Islamic congress party , they gave full freedom to distort Indian history by muslim historians like Nurul hasan , Habib family , they all were from Aligarg muslim university , Nehru Indira all promoted these jihadis by giving them opening new universities like Jawahar Lal Nehru Islamic University in Delhi , mean while Muslim Abul Kalam Azad appointed all muslim and their Islamic stooges historians in Universities of hindus in India who glorified Jihadies like Aurangjeb as secular muslim . You look to be reading books from historians of left liberal woke Islamic historians . So no problem with you who is reading distorted history by fake historians of Islamic Indian Universities . Jai shri Ram .
I am not aware of the neo historians of India. I was talking about history written in old times that started in 1200s. I forgot the names. But, there were Ain-i-Akbari, Akbernama, Tabakat-i-Akbari, Riyazus Salatin, Haqiqat-e-Musalman-i-Bangal, Bahar-i-stani Gaebi and some others.
But, you are talking about India after 1947. You are wrong to say Congress was promoting Muslim interests. No, Congress was based on secularism. Modi party is based on Hinduism. It cannot last for many years.
But, why the Hindus are afraid of Muslims. Muslims have voting power but not the political power. But, Modi party has proved that division of Hindustan in 1947 was a correct decision by the Muslims of 1947.
I agree with your opinion about Aurangzeb. Dara was a better candidate. But, Kattar Muslims supported Aurangzeb for seeking the throne. However, note that it was no democracy then. Murad was also capable but he was a heavy drunkard and was despised by the Mullahs.
However, Aurangzeb did not kill his subjects because of religion though he killed his own brothers. But, it wasalso the norm. Think of Emperor Ashoka. He killed his 99 brothers.