What's new

Bangladesh approves Hindu property restoration act

It did not hindus as zamindars. It made those who were either neutral or ppl siding with the british zamindars.

Btw zamindars were there during the moughal rule

Not exactly the same. Mughal/Sultan used to give land which were Khash or government owned. They also used to employ tax collectors. Chirostayee Bondobosto was simply a different concept and land was taken away from farmer and given to the Zamindar. So after this there were hardly any land including the house were owned by Muslims.
 
As long as this law cover only the hindus those who are living in Bangladesh to reclaim their lost property it is ok... But this facility should not be given to the hindus those who migrated to India as they are nothing less then a traitor. If this facility is given to them what they will do is that they will come, claim and take the property, will sell it and will go back to their bharat ma with the money. A flood gate will be open through which Bangladesh will loose billions of dollars. My grandfather was a victim of one of those scum bags who during liberation war promised to my grand father he will not return from India after liberation war and asked my grand father by a renowned market of that time in our home district. Unfortunately my grand father had bought it with most of his savings without proper paper work as that was not possible only based on trust. But that hindu returned to Bangladesh after liberation war and sold it to another people with proper paper work and again return back to India with that money. This way my grand father lost the market through a legal battle. This sort of treacherous lot should not be given any privilege. Even the muslims those who came from India to Bangladesh will not get the chance now to reclaim their lost property then why should Bangladesh give this sort of privilege to the unpatriotic and treacherous hindus those who went to their bharat ma leaving their home country behind :angry:.



What sort of rubbish comment is this!!! Is this professor is a bharti dalal or has any knowledge of mathematics??? How come he got the idea 400-500 hindus are migrating daily to their bharat ma!!! Even if so it makes 182500 people a year and in 25 years it will be 4562500. Then how come even at the rate 500 people migration a day Bangladesh will be without hindu in 25 years where as present number of hindus is around 14-15 million....

Bangladeshi people should take action against such bharti dalals.

Got to do with forced conversion of religion and migration.
 
Got to do with forced conversion of religion and migration.

Forced conversion forced conversion!! What a inferiority complexicity. Try to force convert a muslim and see.. Not that easy. Nobody can force anybody to convert faith. It comes from inside.
 
Wonder what the big deal is. Actually, this report is a good thing. They do deserve their rights.

Wonder what's with some Bharots having their inner fanboys explode about Awami League here :confused:

Living in Bangladesh, things aren't particularly bright in the political world, and that is for Bangladeshis, not India. Economically, things are going to be very hard for low-income and middle class people.

What does Israel-Palestine issue have to do with the thing? Funny that those same people support the Syrian regime :lol:

Bottom line: This does not necessarily guarantee Hasina's victory in the next elections.
 
Not exactly the same. Mughal/Sultan used to give land which were Khash or government owned. They also used to employ tax collectors. Chirostayee Bondobosto was simply a different concept and land was taken away from farmer and given to the Zamindar. So after this there were hardly any land including the house were owned by Muslims.

Chirothayi Bandobasto only made already exiting Jamindars and Elites permanent owners of their land, so that they took the land as their own and spend effort to develop it. It did make them more powerful than what they were in Mughal/Nawab era.

It was reproduced all over India and only West Bengal completed Land Reform till date.

Pakistan never carried out land reform to begin with.
 
Not exactly the same. Mughal/Sultan used to give land which were Khash or government owned. They also used to employ tax collectors. Chirostayee Bondobosto was simply a different concept and land was taken away from farmer and given to the Zamindar. So after this there were hardly any land including the house were owned by Muslims.

Nawab Bahadur Syed Nawab Ali Chowdhury
Nawab Khwaja Ahsanullah
Mirza Agha Bakar

These are some muslims jomidars. Jomidari was created to pacify the elites and help british rule bengal.
 
Chirothayi Bandobasto only made already exiting Jamindars and Elites permanent owners of their land, so that they took the land as their own and spend effort to develop it. It did make them more powerful than what they were in Mughal/Nawab era.

It was reproduced all over India and only West Bengal completed Land Reform till date.

Pakistan never carried out land reform to begin with.

That was just far from reality. That time there were no land record, people used to own the land through possession. Once Zamindar were entitled to the land than all the land possesed by the ordinary farmer includin home gone to Zamindar.

East Pakistan passed the land reform act in 1949. Settlement done over the next 12 years and completed by 1963. Zamindari was abolished in 1949.
 
Nawab Bahadur Syed Nawab Ali Chowdhury
Nawab Khwaja Ahsanullah
Mirza Agha Bakar

These are some muslims jomidars. Jomidari was created to pacify the elites and help british rule bengal.

Yes we know the name. They were more Nawab than a Zamindar. You know what I meant.
 
Hindu zamindars were called rajas,that did not make them rajas. it was just a move to please the upper class.

Well you can bring exception here and there. I was talking about the suffering of mass people. There were hardly any Muslim Zamindar other than some in Dhaka and Rajshahi. But most of them earned good name though.
 
That was just far from reality. That time there were no land record, people used to own the land through possession. Once Zamindar were entitled to the land than all the land possesed by the ordinary farmer gone to Zamindar.

East Pakistan passed the land reform act in 1949. Settlement done over the next 12 years and completed by 1963. Zamindari was abolished in 1949.

There were Zamindars before permanent settlement, however permanent settlement make them owner of their land which was until then owned by Nawab/East India company and inspection was carried out each year.

from Wiki

Earlier zamindar]]s in Bengal, Bihar and Orissa had been functionaries who held the right to collect revenue on behalf of the Mughal emperor and his representative or diwan in Bengal. The diwan supervised the zamindars to ensure that they were neither lax nor overly stringent. When the East India Company was awarded the diwani or overlordship of Bengal by the empire following the Battle of Buxar in 1764, it found itself short of trained administrators, especially those familiar with local custom and law. As a result, landholders were unsupervised or they reported to corrupt and indolent officials. The result was that revenues were extracted without regard for future income or local welfare.

Following the devastating famine of 1770, which was partially caused by this short-sightedness, Company officials in Calcutta better understood the importance of oversight of revenue officials. They failed to consider the question of incentivisation; hence Warren Hastings, then governor-general, introduced a system of five-yearly inspections and temporary tax farmers.

Many of those appointed as tax farmers absconded with as much revenue as they could during the time period between inspections. Parliament took note of the disastrous consequences of the system, and in 1784 British Prime Minister William Pitt the Younger directed the Calcutta administration to alter it immediately. In 1786 Charles Cornwallis was sent out to India to reform the company's practices.

In 1786 the East India Company Court of Directors first proposed a permanent settlement for Bengal, changing the policy then being followed by Calcutta, which was attempting to increase taxation of zamindars. Between 1786 and 1790, the new Governor-General Lord Cornwallis and Sir John Shore (later Governor-General) entered a heated debate over whether or not to introduce a permanent settlement with the zamindars. Shore argued that the native zamindars would not trust the permanent settlement to be permanent, and that it would take time before they realised it was genuine. Cornwallis believed that they would immediately accept it and begin investing in improving their land. In 1790 the Court of Directors issued a ten-year (Decennial) settlement to the zamindars, which was made permanent in 1800. By Permanent settlement Act 1793,Zamindars class became more powerful than they were in Mughal period.​



The context of pointing out West Bengal abolished Zamindari system is to show that - Zamindars were privileged classes and local Hindu farmers were discriminated just as bad as Muslim farmers. It's just that majority of farmers in East Bengal were Muslims.
 
Well you can bring exception here and there. I was talking about the suffering of mass people. There were hardly any Muslim Zamindar other than some in Dhaka and Rajshahi. But most of them earned good name though.

Haha, still happening bro, AL and BNP has taken the roles of the zamindars.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 1, Members: 0, Guests: 1)


Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom