What's new

Ayatollah Khamenei’s fatwa: Insulting the Mother of the Faithful Aisha is prohibited

Status
Not open for further replies.
Nobody cares about khamnaei fatwa.anyone who insults sahaba or who insults Islam are not among us.we as a sunni,following the right path.neither we follow self created wahaabism nor self created shia religion.it just doesn't matter.anyone who insults religion or sahaba or prophet wives,will surely see hell hereafter.no respect for khomaenei,no respect for shia.they can do whatever they want.
 
Neo-Covert.....great word, accurate description !

This thread will eventually fall into sectarian mudslinging with attempts by the usual 4-5 members.
They've been trained to carry a brain of , my molvi is right , the rest of you will go to hell------ in other words my way or the bomb way
 
Disrespecting Prophet's Family and his companions should be banned , this only show the frustration and hate people carry in heart for one another ... Abu Bakr, Omar, Uthman and Ali they all fought besides Prophet Muhammad Pbuh and lived their lives as brothers .. but after their deaths we divide ourselves by making theories and claims which none of these Great Personalities ever made ..
 
Hey lets appreciate them shall we ,for this, we need to go a thousand steps in return to thier single step...
Oye... your reply also doesn't answer my one simple question!
Don't forget, you are the preacher party, you must answer.

Only All "mushrik and bidaatiz" dead would satisfy your queries . Btw are you by any chance happen to be a neo convert ?
Its a statistical question... i repeat: how many alive women in Iran goes by name of Aisha?
 
Oye... your reply also doesn't answer my one simple question!
Don't forget, you are the preacher party, you must answer.
Man you are here to divide Muslims but you cannot. Pakistan has only one theory Shia Sunni Bhai.

Its a statistical question... how many alive women in Iran goes by name of Aisha?
Please stop your constant attempts to divide Shia and Sunnis in Pakistan. We all are brothers here.
 
No one can deny the differences between two branches of Islam. But when we put their similarities together, we will conclude that those differences are fading, prophet Allah Quran Hadith etc. Serious problems will be solved by our prophet pbuh himself, he will say that who was rightful to have Islamic states under his rule. Ali or Abu bakr (رضی الله عنهما) and i am sure Allah will forgive both of them coz together they tried for strengthen of Islam . Also they Never went to war with each other so we are brothers of one religion with different leaders.
We are not the judge here and never can be.
In case of Ayisha pbuh, she is a sacred person for all Muslims without exception.

Both sunni and shia dont use brain when it comes to judge why the differences arose immediately after Prophet (PBUH) death and why Hazrat Ali (RA) was not elected first caliph with the consensus of all the Meccan tribes. Everyone applies religious angle to this whole conflict b/w Hazrat Abu Bakr and Hazrat Ali RA.

What people should analyze is Hazrat Ali R.A was from Quraysh which was considered inferior by the Ummaya tribe mainly and other tribes was also cautious of Quraysh. It was a full blown tribal rivalry which even islamic teachings weren't enough to subdue. Nobody wanted a Qurayshi ruling over the their tribes at the time of Prophet Mohammad PBUH Death.... Hence a Neutral person was agreed upon by all the tribes that would neither cause an offence to dominant tribe or would cause Quraysh to cause a rebellion.

100,000 people attended Khutba tul Widaa, How many came to give bayt to Hazrat Ali and support his claim of Caliphate after Hazrat Mohammad PBUH death ?

No Doubt Hazrat Ali followers protested when Hazrat Abu Bakr RA was made caliph , But were they in majority ???


So Hazrat Abu Bakr RA became a majority elected democratic leader. If Shias cant accept people will of that time, then they should present their case in the Court of Allah at the day of judgement instead of abusing and causing schism in religion.


This is the reason when Hazrat Ali RA became caliph,, Ummaya couldn't digest a Qurayshi becoming a caliph and rose against Him giving an excuse that He didnot avenge the murder of Hazrat Usman RA. Which if we see in introspection that this is the same reason Hazrat Abu Bakr RA gave to Hazrat Ali RA that I become leader in haste because there was going to be a schism b/w tribes if a leader was not selected at the earliest and Hazrat Ali RA didnot caused any rebellion. Hazrat ALI RA wanted a same timeout period as of Hazrat Abu Bakr to find Muslim rebellions who killed Hazrat Usman and not indiscriminately kill everyone who participated in the rebellion

Shia call first 3 rulers usurpers. I mean on what basis? Who give shia a right to raise fingers on a majority elected leaders. ? If they can digest a majority elected decision, as I said, they should present their case to court of Allah
 
Last edited:
Man you are here to divide Muslims but you cannot. Pakistan has only one theory Shia Sunni Bhai.
If my simple question is dividing you, than I must say you can't build foundation of any sort of brotherhood on hypocrisy.
 
No please don't involve sunni in this brotherhood. We don't want to see hell hereafter.we have no relations with shia or Wahhabi.they created their own religions. They can give fatwa.who cares! We don't care.they all go to hell.
 
Oye... your reply also doesn't answer my one simple question!
Don't forget, you are the preacher party, you must answer.


Its a statistical question... i repeat: how many alive women in Iran goes by name of Aisha?
Hey shove ur "oye", learn to argue with respect or go rant away in some kids forum, the only way to curb a divide is to forgive and forget and start a new yet people like u who bring past infractions to bottle new positive developments are nothing but weeds that hold back a good crop, i know they have a long history of abusing sacred personalities yet the islamic way is to forgive and let a human bieng progress if he shows inclination towards righteousness, do u think islam would've gotten past medina if muslims stuck themselves in the wrongs committed by people in the past, they have on their own realised that they were in the wrong and their spiritual leader has issued a fatwa stopping a wrong practice and that is something to be commended....
 
All this shia suni brother story is false.we don't respect those people who disrespect our religion. We have nothing to do with shia and Wahhabi.
 
If my simple question is dividing you, than I must say you can't build foundation of any sort of brotherhood on hypocrisy.
I have one Question How is the House of SAUD the King of Saudi Arabia. When he is not the decedent of Holy Prophet (PBUH)?
There is only one King to the Land of Nejad that is My Holy Prophet (PBUH). I don't believe in British imposed King in world war 1.
 
All this shia suni brother story is false.we don't respect those people who disrespect our religion. We have nothing to do with shia and Wahhabi.
So if they are trying to stop those insults and are passing fatwas declaring that practice haram, isnt that a good thing??, doesnt that make us brotherly muslims again with no differences??, u people hate just for the sake of hate, u have nothing to do with islam, u have a tribal mentality, u need to have someone to fight, islam isnt a tribal religion, its a global one, it believes in taking all under its folds, specially those who were wrong in the past but have now corrected thier ways...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 1, Members: 0, Guests: 1)


Back
Top Bottom