He is not being targeted for being a Shia-
He is being punished for insulting the Holy Prophets companions-
Thousands of Shia come to Makkah for pilgrimage-
This is a one off case-
Blame lies with only him-
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
punishment for Blashmy is ok if it just makes the person who commited blashmy to realize his mistake, but this punishment is to kill a man cold bloodedlyNothing wrong here. There country there laws, you got a problem, don't go.
The fact that he was on pilgrimage is even more disgusting.
He is not being targeted for being a Shia-
He is being punished for insulting the Holy Prophets companions-
Thousands of Shia come to Makkah for pilgrimage-
This is a one off case-
Blame lies with only him-
His son Isaam Almaribe, 21, said his father suffered from diabetes and had broken bones in his back and knees from a car accident.
"He couldn't survive 50 lashes, let alone 500 lashes," he said.
punishment for Blashmy is ok if it just makes the person who commited blashmy to realize his mistake, but this punishment is to kill a man cold bloodedly
punishment for Blashmy is ok if it just makes the person who commited blashmy to realize his mistake, but this punishment is to kill a man cold bloodedly
I understand that, people were speculating that he might be a Shia, so I thought I would point it out.
Although the guy is diabetic and has a broken back. They should show some leniency towards him.
rules are made to make a better man out of one, not to kill.Their rules, their country.
If you can't do the time, don't do the crime.
Although sometimes, the Saudi rules can be really tough.
Would be interesting to know what is the sentence according to Shariat.
BTW, who hands down the sentence, a judge or a Muslim scholar.?
The holy books in Hindu do not advocate this practice of SATI, it was a costom in some sections of Hindus and is outdated based on the changes in time.
But look at you, we move a step forward to realize that God is in every man, women and child. but you are going backwards to punish cruelly a 45 year old man with back problems to be whiped 500 times.
Right now i am cursing the companions of the great saint to get this man into trouble.
Because I curse them, they are not going to loose their holiness, neither they care of what i or others say about them as they are dead, even alive they will not care as they are holi and mans comments does not afect them.
With broken bones and diabetic condition- he took the risk- you know i know how the saudi laws are- and he a grown up man- he should have known better-

We understand he was heard to curse two companions of the prophet Mohammed and that was apparently witnessed by at least one person who then brought that charge against Mr Almaribe.
rules are made to make a better man out of one, not to kill.
If its about doing time in the jail, i would have not come down harsh, but whipping a man 500 times is a punishment to kill the poor guy.
rules are made to make a better man out of one, not to kill.
If its about doing time in the jail, i would have not come down harsh, but whipping a man 500 times is a punishment to kill the poor guy.
Yeah seems like a pretty dumb thing to do, that too on a pilgrimage
So am guessing Shias don't like these companions for some reason?
Although it does sound cruel, but again, their country, their laws. He should have been knowing the laws of KSA.
Like when I was in Muscat, the first thing I was said was that NEVER say anything against the Sultan, there are Secret Service agents all over, Cabs, rooms, hotels, malls, they hear you, then you are history.

So am guessing Shias don't like these companions for some reason?