Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Are there any pre-1971 Awami League activists remaining active within BAL?
- Thread starter Paul2
- Start date
DalalErMaNodi
BANNED
- May 12, 2020
- 5,290
- 6
- Country
- Location
Yes, many..
But what happened before '71 is not all that relevant in the current political system and by extension in BAL.
Alot of senior BAL members and cabinet ministers played no significant role in '71 or earlier..
What I'm trying to say is nobody is accepted into the party on the basis of their past.. but it is a plus, as they will use it to sell you to the public during campaigning season.
They're like any other party in the world to be honest.
But what happened before '71 is not all that relevant in the current political system and by extension in BAL.
Alot of senior BAL members and cabinet ministers played no significant role in '71 or earlier..
What I'm trying to say is nobody is accepted into the party on the basis of their past.. but it is a plus, as they will use it to sell you to the public during campaigning season.
They're like any other party in the world to be honest.
Bilal9
ELITE MEMBER
- Feb 4, 2014
- 26,736
- 9
- Country
- Location
Guys this story will be interesting to you, in how RAW engineered faction and divisions in Awami League, created Rakkhi Bahini using Sheikh Fazlul Huq Moni, and killed off older pre-1971 Awami League challenger stalwarts who were not so India-shill as others.
@Atlas Bhai tell me if this article is factual per your accounts...
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bangladesh Slipping out Indian Periphery?
Standing behind vendetta in Dhaka will be an ill-conceived step by world’s largest democracy, which will isolate itself in South Asia. It lost Maldives and Nepal, will it lose Bangladesh?
Since the British had left, the political landscape of Indian subcontinent turned in to a hotbed of intrigues and tussles. Three Indo Pakistan wars have been waged with vicious ferocity, yet the region is still politically perturbed. Of the three, one war turned out to be a war of liberation of another country, which has, since then battled silent hegemonistic encroachment of India in its affairs through multiple avenues.
BLF: An Indian Satellite
In the paper, 1971 war was between Pakistan and India-Bangladesh allied forces, but behind the scenes, India’s premier intelligence agency Research and Analysis Wing (RAW) had different designs. As the leader of Bangladesh’s struggle for freedom was in prison in West Pakistan in 1971, First Prime Minister of Bangladesh, Tajuddin Ahmed, who led the political wing of the Bangladeshi cause, was not competent enough in RAW’s views to bring the outcome of Pakistan’s breakup into India’s favor.
In order to bog down Tajuddin Ahmed led the movement, RAW clandestinely formed infamous Mujib Bahini (BLF), led by prominent youth leaders of Awami League politics at that time. This organization got direct support from RAW in its clandestine operations, that never seriously aimed at fighting Pakistan Armed Forces, but rather focused on confronting Bangladesh Mukti Bahini (FF). The reason for this parallel force formation by RAW is its lack of confidence in FF. Bangladesh suffered so much shock in the hands of the elements of BLF in later days.
RAW’s goal was to achieve the breakup of Pakistan by the pro-Indian leadership of BLF rather than through nationalistic FF. All of the commanding officers of FF were 1965 war veterans and they were never comfortable with Indian counterparts. Sector Commander Ziaur Rahman (Later Army chief and President of Bangladesh) was a recipient of 2nd highest gallantry award of Pakistan Armed forces during the 1965 Indo-Pak war. Tajuddin Ahmed was viewed as pro-Leftist, which was alarming for Indian policymakers. Both FF and Tajuddin Ahmed led cabinet were outraged to find the nefarious objectives of BLF, which according to the Deputy Commander in Chief FF, was to turn Bangladesh into a “Satellite state” of India.
Cometh independence, cometh trouble
Unable to bear the success of Tajuddin Ahmed, Moni, one of the four leaders of BLF threatened to launch a civil war, if Tajuddin Ahmed did not relinquish. This man, Moni, was a nephew of Bangladeshi struggle of freedom’s undisputed leader Bangabandhu. Moni’s threat was not a hollow one, for he was a commander of an armed outfit backed by RAW. RAW used this influence to subsequently create distance between Bangabandhu and Tajuddin Ahmed and successfully sow discord into Bangladeshi politics.
India was never happy with the formation of full-fledged professional armed force units in Bangladesh. To keep Indian influence more assertive, Bangabandhu was convinced to bring the BLF into the mainstream and with the members of it formed another notorious force “Rakkhi Bahini”. Bangladeshi journalist Ghulam Murshid once equated Rakkhi Bahini’s level with the infamous Gestapo, while Pakistani author Anthony Mascarenhas found little differences of it with the Nazi Brownshirts. A number of people either killed or got disappeared into the hands of Rakkhi Bahini was about 30,000 between 25 months of 1972 and 1974. This infamous force was armed and trained under the eyes of General Uban from RAW.
While one batch of BLF enlisted into Rakkhi Bahini, others were fitted into an opposition camp named JASAD, which in turn, sought ideological blessings from an Indian party (Socialist Unity Center of India). This party, which wanted to style itself with Chinese Communist Party with Indian mentoring, resorted to the insurgency, that plunged the war-ravaged country into chaos. JASAD was so far the largest opposition party then, and oddly enough, both the government and opposition had strong insider elements that were strongly influenced by India.
In the midst of doldrums, in 1975, a pro-US coup dislodged Awami League government, that resulted in the tragic and gruesome assassination of the President Bangabandhu and his family. Although the main actors of the coup were pro-US elements, the architect of its path was the JASAD and its imprudent activities.
Aim to Finish Two Birds with One Stone
In 1975, between August 15 and November 7, Bangladesh passed its most tumultuous period since independence. Rumors piled over the country, coups and counter-coups passed on. During this period, the Dehradun trained BLF played the role of villain, donning different jerseys. Same players of BLF were in two opponent groups: JASAD and pro-government Rakkhi Bahini. Senior officers in the army were anxious to bring back discipline, yet none was competent enough to initiate. This situation was ideal for India to see a potential armed force to get into disarray, that will see the capitulation of several illustrious officers.
“Operation Panther” was the most undiscussed yet the most overriding episode of Bangladeshi politics, which was a heinous episode in the history of Bangladesh. General Khaled Musharraf, one of the most prolific war heroes of Bangladesh was more inclined to bring back the chain of command in the army, while his ally in the mission, Brigadier Nuruzzaman, the chief of notorious Rakkhi Bahini wanted something more. Dismayed by Khaled’s adamant objective, Nuruzzaman decided to eliminate him. Khaled Musharraf’s illustrious career ended when he was assassinated along with his trusted comrades into the hands of his supposed custodians in the morning of November 7.
Ziaur Rahman ascended into the helm of Bangladesh shortly afterward, but he too had to face unruly JASAD elements in the politics. Zia survived 18 coup attempts but succumbed after the next. But his death also cost the life of another prolific war veteran in General Manzur, who was killed in custody, and an accused of his murder was former army dictator Ershad, who came to power through the silent and tacit support from New Delhi. Nevertheless, Bangladesh battled India backed insurgency in hill tracts during the military rule.
Transition to Democracy: Old Wine in New Bottle
Military rule in Bangladesh ended in 1990, and the era of the Battling Begums began. Prior to the transition to democracy, a pro-Indian intelligentsia community grew up in Bangladesh. This community branded itself as a “torch bearer” of the “spirit of liberation war”, which maintained close collaboration with Awami League in politics. This community has remained so far a bona fide channel for India to project Indian influence in the Bangladeshi political spectrum. The narcissistic intelligentsia community, that spreads from academia, media and cultural field, gave a sound backbone to Awami League to unevenly take on its oppositions. The intelligentsia movement is now resorting to Fascist language to counter their opposition.
India was uneasy with the Bangladesh-Pakistan rapprochement during the reign of Khaleda Zia and was unnerved by the ten truck arms haul in Bangladesh, which was destined to fuel Assam insurgency, which meant, India will never be at ease unless its ally Awami League is brought back into power.
Bangladesh was supposed to move into national elections in 2006, but Awami League launched a violent street agitation, that brought Army again into Bangladeshi politics. The interim government backed by Army failed to resolve the political standoff and had to rely on India for its safe exit. Former Indian president Pranab Mukherjee revealed in his biography, how he ensured the return of Awami League in power by managing the then army chief of Bangladesh in 2008. India’s open support behind Hasina during 2014 controversial elections has set a new example of the most objectionable way of meddling in other sovereign countries matters.
India’s Bangladesh Outlook
Standing in the 21st century, India still relies on its hawkish, medieval, feudalistic foreign policy when it comes to dealing with smaller neighbors. Despite political instability, people of Bangladesh have shown resilience to come to its present state, even surpassing India in terms of various human development index. Bangladeshi people are not willing to accept the Indian language of bullying, an image of BSF is enough to tarnish Indian image in rural Bangladesh, Indian antics in handling common river water sharing have turned Bangladeshi feelings towards India into a hostile faculty. Bangladeshi community is looking more towards China and Japan for co-operation and developments.
In a country, where China is gaining upper hand swiftly, and where an election is due later this year, it’s up to India to repeat its 2014 antics and stand behind a regime that routinely silences its critiques. If it does, India must bear in mind, it will make a hostile entity out of its own misadventures. Standing behind vendetta in Dhaka will be an ill-conceived step by world’s largest democracy, which will isolate itself in South Asia. It lost Maldives and Nepal, will it lose Bangladesh?
DISCLAIMER: The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy and position of Regional Rapport.
Bangladesh Slipping out Indian Periphery?
Since the British had left, the political landscape of Indian subcontinent turned in to a hotbed of intrigues and tussles. Three Indo Pakistan wars have been waged with vicious ferocity, yet the region is still politically perturbed. Of the three, one war turned out to be a war of liberation of...
regionalrapport.com
@Atlas Bhai tell me if this article is factual per your accounts...
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bangladesh Slipping out Indian Periphery?
Standing behind vendetta in Dhaka will be an ill-conceived step by world’s largest democracy, which will isolate itself in South Asia. It lost Maldives and Nepal, will it lose Bangladesh?
Since the British had left, the political landscape of Indian subcontinent turned in to a hotbed of intrigues and tussles. Three Indo Pakistan wars have been waged with vicious ferocity, yet the region is still politically perturbed. Of the three, one war turned out to be a war of liberation of another country, which has, since then battled silent hegemonistic encroachment of India in its affairs through multiple avenues.
BLF: An Indian Satellite
In the paper, 1971 war was between Pakistan and India-Bangladesh allied forces, but behind the scenes, India’s premier intelligence agency Research and Analysis Wing (RAW) had different designs. As the leader of Bangladesh’s struggle for freedom was in prison in West Pakistan in 1971, First Prime Minister of Bangladesh, Tajuddin Ahmed, who led the political wing of the Bangladeshi cause, was not competent enough in RAW’s views to bring the outcome of Pakistan’s breakup into India’s favor.
In order to bog down Tajuddin Ahmed led the movement, RAW clandestinely formed infamous Mujib Bahini (BLF), led by prominent youth leaders of Awami League politics at that time. This organization got direct support from RAW in its clandestine operations, that never seriously aimed at fighting Pakistan Armed Forces, but rather focused on confronting Bangladesh Mukti Bahini (FF). The reason for this parallel force formation by RAW is its lack of confidence in FF. Bangladesh suffered so much shock in the hands of the elements of BLF in later days.
RAW’s goal was to achieve the breakup of Pakistan by the pro-Indian leadership of BLF rather than through nationalistic FF. All of the commanding officers of FF were 1965 war veterans and they were never comfortable with Indian counterparts. Sector Commander Ziaur Rahman (Later Army chief and President of Bangladesh) was a recipient of 2nd highest gallantry award of Pakistan Armed forces during the 1965 Indo-Pak war. Tajuddin Ahmed was viewed as pro-Leftist, which was alarming for Indian policymakers. Both FF and Tajuddin Ahmed led cabinet were outraged to find the nefarious objectives of BLF, which according to the Deputy Commander in Chief FF, was to turn Bangladesh into a “Satellite state” of India.
Cometh independence, cometh trouble
Unable to bear the success of Tajuddin Ahmed, Moni, one of the four leaders of BLF threatened to launch a civil war, if Tajuddin Ahmed did not relinquish. This man, Moni, was a nephew of Bangladeshi struggle of freedom’s undisputed leader Bangabandhu. Moni’s threat was not a hollow one, for he was a commander of an armed outfit backed by RAW. RAW used this influence to subsequently create distance between Bangabandhu and Tajuddin Ahmed and successfully sow discord into Bangladeshi politics.
India was never happy with the formation of full-fledged professional armed force units in Bangladesh. To keep Indian influence more assertive, Bangabandhu was convinced to bring the BLF into the mainstream and with the members of it formed another notorious force “Rakkhi Bahini”. Bangladeshi journalist Ghulam Murshid once equated Rakkhi Bahini’s level with the infamous Gestapo, while Pakistani author Anthony Mascarenhas found little differences of it with the Nazi Brownshirts. A number of people either killed or got disappeared into the hands of Rakkhi Bahini was about 30,000 between 25 months of 1972 and 1974. This infamous force was armed and trained under the eyes of General Uban from RAW.
While one batch of BLF enlisted into Rakkhi Bahini, others were fitted into an opposition camp named JASAD, which in turn, sought ideological blessings from an Indian party (Socialist Unity Center of India). This party, which wanted to style itself with Chinese Communist Party with Indian mentoring, resorted to the insurgency, that plunged the war-ravaged country into chaos. JASAD was so far the largest opposition party then, and oddly enough, both the government and opposition had strong insider elements that were strongly influenced by India.
In the midst of doldrums, in 1975, a pro-US coup dislodged Awami League government, that resulted in the tragic and gruesome assassination of the President Bangabandhu and his family. Although the main actors of the coup were pro-US elements, the architect of its path was the JASAD and its imprudent activities.
Aim to Finish Two Birds with One Stone
In 1975, between August 15 and November 7, Bangladesh passed its most tumultuous period since independence. Rumors piled over the country, coups and counter-coups passed on. During this period, the Dehradun trained BLF played the role of villain, donning different jerseys. Same players of BLF were in two opponent groups: JASAD and pro-government Rakkhi Bahini. Senior officers in the army were anxious to bring back discipline, yet none was competent enough to initiate. This situation was ideal for India to see a potential armed force to get into disarray, that will see the capitulation of several illustrious officers.
“Operation Panther” was the most undiscussed yet the most overriding episode of Bangladeshi politics, which was a heinous episode in the history of Bangladesh. General Khaled Musharraf, one of the most prolific war heroes of Bangladesh was more inclined to bring back the chain of command in the army, while his ally in the mission, Brigadier Nuruzzaman, the chief of notorious Rakkhi Bahini wanted something more. Dismayed by Khaled’s adamant objective, Nuruzzaman decided to eliminate him. Khaled Musharraf’s illustrious career ended when he was assassinated along with his trusted comrades into the hands of his supposed custodians in the morning of November 7.
Ziaur Rahman ascended into the helm of Bangladesh shortly afterward, but he too had to face unruly JASAD elements in the politics. Zia survived 18 coup attempts but succumbed after the next. But his death also cost the life of another prolific war veteran in General Manzur, who was killed in custody, and an accused of his murder was former army dictator Ershad, who came to power through the silent and tacit support from New Delhi. Nevertheless, Bangladesh battled India backed insurgency in hill tracts during the military rule.
Transition to Democracy: Old Wine in New Bottle
Military rule in Bangladesh ended in 1990, and the era of the Battling Begums began. Prior to the transition to democracy, a pro-Indian intelligentsia community grew up in Bangladesh. This community branded itself as a “torch bearer” of the “spirit of liberation war”, which maintained close collaboration with Awami League in politics. This community has remained so far a bona fide channel for India to project Indian influence in the Bangladeshi political spectrum. The narcissistic intelligentsia community, that spreads from academia, media and cultural field, gave a sound backbone to Awami League to unevenly take on its oppositions. The intelligentsia movement is now resorting to Fascist language to counter their opposition.
India was uneasy with the Bangladesh-Pakistan rapprochement during the reign of Khaleda Zia and was unnerved by the ten truck arms haul in Bangladesh, which was destined to fuel Assam insurgency, which meant, India will never be at ease unless its ally Awami League is brought back into power.
Bangladesh was supposed to move into national elections in 2006, but Awami League launched a violent street agitation, that brought Army again into Bangladeshi politics. The interim government backed by Army failed to resolve the political standoff and had to rely on India for its safe exit. Former Indian president Pranab Mukherjee revealed in his biography, how he ensured the return of Awami League in power by managing the then army chief of Bangladesh in 2008. India’s open support behind Hasina during 2014 controversial elections has set a new example of the most objectionable way of meddling in other sovereign countries matters.
India’s Bangladesh Outlook
Standing in the 21st century, India still relies on its hawkish, medieval, feudalistic foreign policy when it comes to dealing with smaller neighbors. Despite political instability, people of Bangladesh have shown resilience to come to its present state, even surpassing India in terms of various human development index. Bangladeshi people are not willing to accept the Indian language of bullying, an image of BSF is enough to tarnish Indian image in rural Bangladesh, Indian antics in handling common river water sharing have turned Bangladeshi feelings towards India into a hostile faculty. Bangladeshi community is looking more towards China and Japan for co-operation and developments.
In a country, where China is gaining upper hand swiftly, and where an election is due later this year, it’s up to India to repeat its 2014 antics and stand behind a regime that routinely silences its critiques. If it does, India must bear in mind, it will make a hostile entity out of its own misadventures. Standing behind vendetta in Dhaka will be an ill-conceived step by world’s largest democracy, which will isolate itself in South Asia. It lost Maldives and Nepal, will it lose Bangladesh?
DISCLAIMER: The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy and position of Regional Rapport.
Last edited:
VikingRaider
SENIOR MEMBER
- Aug 2, 2018
- 6,747
- 3
- Country
- Location
@Bilal9 ভাই, এটা নিশ্চিত যে বাংলাদেশ আর ভারতের প্রভাব বলয়ে নেই;অন্তত ৮০% বেরিয়ে এসেছে। তবে ঘরের শত্রু বিভীষণ এখনো রয়েই গেছে, আর পুরাপুরি নির্মুল করাটা খুবই দুরহ।
লেখাটায় সত্যের সাথে কিছুটা ভেজাল মিশিয়ে দেয়া হয়েছে। দেখেন
এই অংশটা খুব সেনসিটিভ। এটা নিয়ে অনেক নিউজ হয়েছে, ডিজিএফআই এর সাবেক চীফ রেজ্জাকুল হায়দার সহ অনেক সামরিক ব্যক্তিত্ব কে জড়ানো হয়েছে, আর বিচার খুব ঢাক ঢোল পিটিয়ে করা হয়েছে, যেটার কোন দরকার ছিল না।
এই ঢাকঢোলে পিটানোর জন্যে আমাদের যত সমস্যা! এতে করে কিন্তু আসলে প্রাকারান্তরে স্বীকার করে নেয়া হয়েছে যে বাংলাদেশ অফিসিয়ালি বিচ্ছিন্নতাবাদী দের সাহায্য করে; সবাই বলবে যে এটা হাওয়া ভবনের কারসাজি ছিল, কিন্তু গনপ্রজাতন্ত্রী বাংলাদেশ সরকারের গেজেটে এই হাওয়া ভবনের কোন অস্তিত্ব নাই।
আমাদের দেশ হল বেকুব আর মাথামোটা গাধা দিয়ে ভরা, যারা আবার ভোটাধিকার ( আসলে ফাঁদ) এর ব্যাপারে দারুন সচেতন, তবে সবটাই কাজীর গরুর মত ; কাগজ কলমে থাকলেই গোয়ালে নাই!
যা আসল কথা হল এইসব গাধামী বাংলাদেশের বিরুদ্ধে ব্যাবহার করা হতে পারে।
But yes again I agree with headline and also highlighted part.
And about China the new super power, Indian stooge portion of BAL can't even go against China even they wish to!
That's why I personally feel safe and happy that India will never have stronger grasp on Bangladesh, as long as China remain as super power, or at least regional power.
But as I said earlier , China must have the access to the bay of Bengal directly through Myanmar; we like it or not, it's the reality, since we don't share border with china.
In the end even China herself can't survive if isolated from rest of the world.
ফাইনালি পরিমনির ব্যাপার টা ভাল করে বুঝতে হবে। যদিও পিনাকি বলে যে হাসিনা সুযোগ হারাল, তবে আমার ধারনা যে এট একটা বিনিময় এবং বিনিয়োগ।
১ টার বিনিময়ে ১১ টা যদি কব্জা করা যায় সমস্যা কি? যাক আমি কিন্তু কিছু বলি নাই, এটা আমার ব্যক্তিগত মতামত মাত্র!
এই নিউজ টা পড়ে দেখেন, @Bilal9 ভাই!
বাংলাদেশে ১১ সাংবাদিক নেতার ব্যাংক হিসাব তলব নিয়ে ব্যাপক আলোচনা
www.voabangla.com
ফাইনালি, পরিমনি বলেন বা অন্য কোন র এর ছুঁচো, এদের যদি হাতে নাতে গোয়েন্দা বৃত্তির সময় না ধরতে পারেন, তবে কিন্তু মদের মামলা দিয়ে লাভ হয় না।
আর হাতে নাতে ধরলে সেটা পত্রিকায় কিন্তু মদের বা পর্নের মামলার আকারেই আসবে৷ কেউ বলবে না যে র এর চর ধরা পড়েছে তাই না?
সাংবাদিক হলে আসবে সম্পদের হিসাবের ব্যাপারে, সরাসরি নয়!
তাই আমি ফাইনালি মনে করি যে বাংলাদেশ ভারতের মধ্যে আসলে ইঁদুর বিড়াল খেলা চলছে। অবশ্য আমাদের মাথামোটা জাতি এসব বুঝবে না, তারা বলবে সে উচ্চ পর্যায়ের লোক জন এখন আবার দেশ বেচে দিতে ভারত যাচ্ছে!
তবে এই ভাবনার একটা সুন্দর দিক আছে আর সেটা হল গাধা জনতার দৃষ্টি অন্য দিকে ফিরিয়ে রেখে শান্তি তে কাজ করা যায়, এতে খরচ কম হয়!
Last edited:
Bilal9
ELITE MEMBER
- Feb 4, 2014
- 26,736
- 9
- Country
- Location
@Bilal9 ভাই, এটা নিশ্চিত যে বাংলাদেশ আর ভারতের প্রভাব বলয়ে নেই;অন্তত ৮০% বেরিয়ে এসেছে। তবে ঘরের শত্রু বিভীষণ এখনো রয়েই গেছে, আর পুরাপুরি নির্মুল করাটা খুবই দুরহ।
লেখাটায় সত্যের সাথে কিছুটা ভেজাল মিশিয়ে দেয়া হয়েছে। দেখেন
এই অংশটা খুব সেনসিটিভ। এটা নিয়ে অনেক নিউজ হয়েছে, ডিজিএফআই এর সাবেক চীফ রেজ্জাকুল হায়দার সহ অনেক সামরিক ব্যক্তিত্ব কে জড়ানো হয়েছে, আর বিচার খুব ঢাক ঢোল পিটিয়ে করা হয়েছে, যেটার কোন দরকার ছিল না।
এই ঢাকঢোলে পিটানোর জন্যে আমাদের যত সমস্যা! এতে করে কিন্তু আসলে প্রাকারান্তরে স্বীকার করে নেয়া হয়েছে যে বাংলাদেশ অফিসিয়ালি বিচ্ছিন্নতাবাদী দের সাহায্য করে; সবাই বলবে যে এটা হাওয়া ভবনের কারসাজি ছিল, কিন্তু গনপ্রজাতন্ত্রী বাংলাদেশ সরকারের গেজেটে এই হাওয়া ভবনের কোন অস্তিত্ব নাই।
আমাদের দেশ হল বেকুব আর মাথামোটা গাধা দিয়ে ভরা, যারা আবার ভোটাধিকার ( আসলে ফাঁদ) এর ব্যাপারে দারুন সচেতন, তবে সবটাই কাজীর গরুর মত ; কাগজ কলমে থাকলেই গোয়ালে নাই!
যা আসল কথা হল এইসব গাধামী বাংলাদেশের বিরুদ্ধে ব্যাবহার করা হতে পারে।
But yes again I agree with headline and also highlighted part.
And about China the new super power, Indian stooge portion of BAL can't even go against China even they wish to!
That's why I personally feel safe and happy that India will never have stronger grasp on Bangladesh, as long as China remain as super power, or at least regional power.
But as I said earlier , China must have the access to the bay of Bengal directly through Myanmar; we like it or not, it's the reality, since we don't share border with china.
In the end even China herself can't survive if isolated from rest of the world.
ফাইনালি পরিমনির ব্যাপার টা ভাল করে বুঝতে হবে। যদিও পিনাকি বলে যে হাসিনা সুযোগ হারাল, তবে আমার ধারনা যে এট একটা বিনিময় এবং বিনিয়োগ।
১ টার বিনিময়ে ১১ টা যদি কব্জা করা যায় সমস্যা কি? যাক আমি কিন্তু কিছু বলি নাই, এটা আমার ব্যক্তিগত মতামত মাত্র!
এই নিউজ টা পড়ে দেখেন, @Bilal9 ভাই!
বাংলাদেশে ১১ সাংবাদিক নেতার ব্যাংক হিসাব তলব নিয়ে ব্যাপক আলোচনা
ফাইনালি, পরিমনি বলেন বা অন্য কোন র এর ছুঁচো, এদের যদি হাতে নাতে গোয়েন্দা বৃত্তির সময় না ধরতে পারেন, তবে কিন্তু মদের মামলা দিয়ে লাভ হয় না।
আর হাতে নাতে ধরলে সেটা পত্রিকায় কিন্তু মদের বা পর্নের মামলার আকারেই আসবে৷ কেউ বলবে না যে র এর চর ধরা পড়েছে তাই না?
সাংবাদিক হলে আসবে সম্পদের হিসাবের ব্যাপারে, সরাসরি নয়!
তাই আমি ফানালি মনে করি যে বাংলাদেশ ভারতেত মধ্যে আসলে ইঁদুর বিড়াল খেলা চলছে। অবশ্য আমাদের মাথামোটা জাতি এসব বুঝবে না, তারা বলবে সে উচ্চ পর্যায়ের লোক জন এখন আবার দেশ বেচে দিতে ভারত যাচ্ছে!
তবে এই ভাবনার একটা সুন্দর দিক আছে আর সেটা হল গাধা জনতার দৃষ্টি অন্য দিকে ফিরিয়ে রেখে শান্তি তে কাজ করা যায়!
Thanks for your insights @Atlas bhai, which (as always) are revelations to me.
Glad to have you explain things since I'm surrounded mostly by businesspeople and not politicians or journalists.
TigerOfMysore
FULL MEMBER
- Feb 28, 2017
- 1,592
- 2
- Country
- Location
Jhara Winds from the East - announcement about to come!
VikingRaider
SENIOR MEMBER
- Aug 2, 2018
- 6,747
- 3
- Country
- Location
@Bilal9 bhai, please take a look. 3 minutes link.
My question is , if you are ot guilty , why you are afraid?
All of us know the salary of (yellow) journalists in Bangladesh.
So why are they upset?
তবে কি শত্রু দেশের গোয়েন্দা সংস্থার টাকা খেয়ে ব্যাংকের অ্যাকাউন্ট এতই ফুলে ফেঁপে উঠেছে যে গোঁজামিলের হিসাব দিয়েও মেলানো যাবে না?
Why journalists should enjoy immunity? Are they not human being like us ? Are they angles of heaven? Of course not, then what's the reason behind such disturbing claim?
কেন তাদের ব্যাংক হিসাব তলব করা যাবে না? এর বিরুদ্ধে নাকি কাল প্রতিবাদ সমাবেশ! কি অবস্থা দেখেন।
আর সময় করে উঠতে পারলে কোন এক সময়ে এইটাও দেখতে পারেন। এটা অবশ্য বড়। তবে প্রথম ২/১ মিনিট দেখলেই বুঝবেন যে সরকার আসলেই লুংগী ( নাকি ধুতি? সে যাই হোক) ধরে টান মেরেছে!
সরকার আর সাংবাদিক নামের র এর অবৈধ সন্তান গুলোর টক্কর আশা করি আগামী দিন গুলোতে আমরা দেখতে পারব।
My question is , if you are ot guilty , why you are afraid?
All of us know the salary of (yellow) journalists in Bangladesh.
So why are they upset?
তবে কি শত্রু দেশের গোয়েন্দা সংস্থার টাকা খেয়ে ব্যাংকের অ্যাকাউন্ট এতই ফুলে ফেঁপে উঠেছে যে গোঁজামিলের হিসাব দিয়েও মেলানো যাবে না?
Why journalists should enjoy immunity? Are they not human being like us ? Are they angles of heaven? Of course not, then what's the reason behind such disturbing claim?
কেন তাদের ব্যাংক হিসাব তলব করা যাবে না? এর বিরুদ্ধে নাকি কাল প্রতিবাদ সমাবেশ! কি অবস্থা দেখেন।
আর সময় করে উঠতে পারলে কোন এক সময়ে এইটাও দেখতে পারেন। এটা অবশ্য বড়। তবে প্রথম ২/১ মিনিট দেখলেই বুঝবেন যে সরকার আসলেই লুংগী ( নাকি ধুতি? সে যাই হোক) ধরে টান মেরেছে!
সরকার আর সাংবাদিক নামের র এর অবৈধ সন্তান গুলোর টক্কর আশা করি আগামী দিন গুলোতে আমরা দেখতে পারব।
Last edited:
Bilal9
ELITE MEMBER
- Feb 4, 2014
- 26,736
- 9
- Country
- Location
Ha ha ha - khela jomey uthsey @Atlas bhai. I love it!
All India shills should be put on notice and this is an excellent time to clean house by catching these culprits. In the US too - crime families are never caught with actual evidence of crime, but small evidence like Tax Evasion proof. The formation of the Bangladesh Financial Intelligence Unit (BFIU) By Bangladesh Bank has now been put to good use. BFIU (from what I have seen) uses classic well-known global financial practices to trace sources of money for AML (Anti Money Laundering) practices. AML became popular in the West to trace origins and sources of money for terrorism, but this is a nice use of it too.
Last edited:
DalalErMaNodi
BANNED
- May 12, 2020
- 5,290
- 6
- Country
- Location
Bilal9
ELITE MEMBER
- Feb 4, 2014
- 26,736
- 9
- Country
- Location
Thik aasey - bhainga koitesi.
Onek journalist Indian HC'er payroll e aasey (Prothom aalo, Daily Star ek nomborey), Indian nanarokom propaganda chhorai. Sangbadikder paler sardar gulir bank account investigate kortesey Bangladesh Bank, taka kivabey pai, kokhon pai, eishob aarki.
Sangbadikra Indiar chakrami korey bhaloi two pice kamaitesilo majhkhaney, shob gomor ekhon faash hoye jabey, betader khobor hoye gesey.
Sangbadikra ekhon eishob nia andolon korar plan kortesey.
Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 1, Members: 0, Guests: 1)
Similar threads
