Anatolians only have 7% genes from Central Asia, we are "Greek" Muslims

[salarsikander]

Iran has every right to re take it because Russian empire And Soviet union don't exist anymore

So when is it ta king it back ?

 

[CriticalThinker02]

Anyone can be a Muslim, a particular race or even a group of people does not have a monopoly on it.

 

[lydian fall]

That is true. Turks are conquered and turkified by invaders

 

[Maira La]

This is wrong.

Turks can have up to 50% Central Asian Turkic ancestry.

 

[lydian fall]

This is wrong.

Turks can have up to 50% Central Asian Turkic ancestry.

View attachment 947423

Yes they look too narrow_eyes like original Turks and mongols

 

[xbat]

why dont persians try to it inside iran? we may see how much perisan the iranians are, iran is one of most crowded DNA place . mongols erased persians on earth, so later ones call themselves persian ha ha ha ha

 

[Maira La]

Yes they look too narrow_eyes like original Turks and mongols

Turks and Mongols are not same people.

And Turks are not a monolithic group. Turkmens, Uzbeks and Uyghurs are not genetically identical.

And Anatolian Turks are not pure Turkmen-like Turkic. There's a lot of pre-Turkic Anatolian ancestry, between 50 and 100%.

 

[ThunderCat]

So Asia Minor never had Armenians, Assyrians, Scythians, Georgians, Parthians...???

 

[Maira La]

@lydian fall
@ThunderCat

How Turks and Mongols differ from each other:

 

[ReasonableStar75]

This reminds me of a joke shared among anthropologist:

"The Turks are more Greeks than they realize, while the Greeks are more Arabs than they like to admit."

White wannabes, all fake neither turks are greeks, nor arabs (real semitic not like actually israelis that comes from europe) has to do with european greeks.

Turks are not an homogeneous group, this is the truth, i have been in turkey many years ago, and south turkey people is different from north.

South turks have a mixture from asiatic people, and north i ll say its more european. I like more the south it has the essence of minor asia.

Greeks were invaders that was the truth. White wannabes are distorting the history for interesting agendas.

 

[Novus ordu seclorum]

Anatolians are very archaic Indo-European people, older than Greeks. Greeks were later settlers and colonizers. Native Anatolian languages gradually became extinct because of Greek influence on non-Greek Anatolians [Helenization].

Anatolian peoples - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

'The Anatolians were Indo-European-speaking peoples of the Anatolian Peninsula in present-day Turkey, identified by their use of the Anatolian languages.[1] These peoples were among the oldest Indo-European ethnolinguistic groups and one of the most archaic, because Anatolians were among the first Indo-European peoples to separate from the Proto-Indo-European community that gave origin to the individual Indo-European peoples.[2][1]'

 

[Song Hong]

Turks and Greek quite similar.

Not sure why Turks hate Greek so much.

Not sure why Turks love Uyghur so much. Sure Turks confuse who are their fathers. Anyhow call some strangers daddy.

 

[ReasonableStar75]

Turks and Greek quite similar.

Have you ever been in Turkey?, you don t know Turkey. You put legend maps that means shit.

 

[Song Hong]

Uyghur is quite far from Turk.

 

[ReasonableStar75]

Uyghur is quite far from Turk.

View attachment 947430

Yes uyghurs are not real turks, no one is saying that, but they have cultural bonds.

Turks are from anatolia, with some mixtures with negihbourn countrie snad central asia.

And all these DNA diagramas are shit, are done for political agendas. A lot of white wannabes are distorting reality for political issues.

Ancient people of turkiyeh, before Christ:

Cyprus was Turkiyeh, @Foinikas