What's new

an Indian Supreme court lawyer declares Ayodhya verdict solely based on ''Hindu majority sentiment''

Those firangis were travelling when the Mughals were in power. Probably not all were Firangis either. Many of them could have Asian travellers including Muslims from other parts of the world. As I said, no one here has seen the evidence on record with the courts so let's not judge sitting here.

However, one can read the 1045 page judgement and then perhaps we can discuss.

So your SC justified criminality and mob violence and destruction of a mosque by rewarding the mob based upon travel writings?

I can't see how Indian Muslims without shame can call themselves Indian anymore
 
So your SC justified criminality and mob violence and destruction of a mosque by rewarding the mob based upon travel writings?

I can't see how Indian Muslims without shame can call themselves Indian anymore

Travel writings was just one kind of evidence. There was more. Will have to read the judgement to know.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 2, Members: 0, Guests: 2)


Back
Top Bottom