an Indian Supreme court lawyer declares Ayodhya verdict solely based on ''Hindu majority sentiment''

[W.11]

Hindus are claiming that there has been evidence of ram temple, this has not been verified by indian supreme court either its proven that the structure was demolished for construction of the mosque. The entire myth of ram's birth and hence the temple is nothing but a mere myth which has been cooked up to justify the ownership of the hindutvas in ayodhya. It should be mentioned the city of ayodhya gets first mentioned as a buddhist site in the buddhist pali canons where it has been referred to as saketa, many buddhist stupas and religious sites have been discovered there indicating that it was not an exclusive hindu holy site.

The verdict is solely based on owner ship of land which according to indian supreme court, hindus have proven and muslims have not in a very strange manner.

Indian supreme court has refused to accept that muslims prayed at the mosque prior to 1858 when it was first recorded by the europeans, while they think that hindus were praying there earlier.

even though babri mosque is a lot older than 1858 , Indian supreme court doesnt accept the ''evidence'' that muslims prayed at their own mosqu.

Hindutvas were contesting that babri mosque itself was a mosque structure and were refering it as a non muslim structure which was not a mosque, but the ayodhya verdict accepts it as a mosque eventually.

Hindutvas have been given pure leverage based on hindus being allowed to pray in the mosque by the muslims.

listen at 7:45

 

[Path-Finder]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1193593298629386241

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1193170245705486337

additional points need mentioning I believe.

 

[SIPRA]

Salute to Quaid e Azam.

Each such incidence revokes his glorious memories.

 

[W.11]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1193593298629386241

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1193170245705486337

additional points need mentioning I believe.

the same tharoor guy was comparing BJP's hindutva politics to muslim league.

regards

 

[SIPRA]

the same tharoor guy was comparing BJP's hindutva politics to muslim league.

regards

Most (above 95 %) of the elite Hindus have same toxic mindset, as far as Muslims and Pakistan is concerned.

"Natha Singh and Prem Singh
One and the same thing"

 

[Gandhi G in da house]

Salute to Quaid e Azam.

Each such incidence revokes his glorious memories.

Verdict has been given on the basis of evidence. Which suggests that Hindus had been praying there since long before Muslims had been praying considering it to be the birth place of Lord Ram. Now, purely on the basis of title and possession, neither of the parties were able to prove exclusive rights.

So faith aspect was taken into account. Ideally still, the property should have perhaps been divided equally between the parties (property here being the land on which the Masjid was located, not the masjid itself). But keeping the faith aspect of Hindus in mind, the property was given to the Hindus and double the land area is to be given to the Muslims somewhere else in Ayodhya as a compensation/restitution.

I think it's fair and much more pragmatic a solution than 50-50.

 

[W.11]

Verdict has been given on the basis of evidence. Which suggests that Hindus had been praying there since long before Muslims had been praying considering it to be the birth place of Lord Ram.

how were hindus praying there before muslims when there is no evidence of hindu temple before the mosque, the entire debate is based on mosque being not used before 1858 which is purely based on BS. lord ram is a myth nothing else.

regards

 

[Chhatrapati]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1193593298629386241

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1193170245705486337

additional points need mentioning I believe.

That's picture of a chariot procession that happened in 90's in Gujarat, Babri Demolition happened in 92. Some fake BS.

As for Taroor wishing Advani Happy Birthday, doesn't make Taroor a Hindutva, he is giving a courtesy to his opposition. Not that I expect these lot to understand just saying.

 

[Gandhi G in da house]

how were hindus praying there before muslims when there is no evidence of hindu temple before the mosque, the entire debate is based on mosque being not used before 1858 which is purely based on BS. lord ram is a myth nothing else.

regards

Hindus always considered it to be the birth place of lord ram and used to pray there irrespective of the mosque.

Lord Ram was a myth to you but it is not for billion Hindus. For them it is a matter of deep faith. Even I can say that Islam is a myth, but that's not it works.

 

[SIPRA]

how were hindus praying there before muslims when there is no evidence of hindu temple before the mosque, the entire debate is based on mosque being not used before 1858 which is purely based on BS. lord ram is a myth nothing else.

regards

But Justice Gangadhui of Kangaroo Court of India doesn't agree with you.

 

[W.11]

Hindus always considered it to be the birth place of lord ram and used to pray there irrespective of the mosque.

Lord Ram was a myth to you but it is not for billion Hindus. For them it is a matter of deep faith. Even I can say that Islam is a myth, but that's not it works.

what is the EVIDENCE. the courts dont entertain myths and legends, they entertain evidences.

regards

 

[SIPRA]

what is the EVIDENCE. the courts dont entertain myths and legends, they entertain evidences.

regards

The evidence is hidden deep in the @$$holes of those 5 scoundrels, of Kangaroo Court of India, who gave this decision.

 

[Gandhi G in da house]

what is the EVIDENCE. the courts dont entertain myths and legends, they entertain evidences.

regards

It's before the court. I haven't gone through it and neither have you. Sitting here on PDF we cannot judge. The courts had traveller's writings among other things to determine that Hindus had been praying there for long.

 

[Goenitz]

traveller's writings among

yeah a frangi... for sure he has to prove that previous govt (muslims) were monstrous and new 'masters' are liberal and Hindus again worshiping wherever they want...

 

[Gandhi G in da house]

yeah a frangi... for sure he has to prove that previous govt (muslims) were monstrous and new 'masters' are liberal and Hindus again worshiping wherever they want...

Those firangis were travelling when the Mughals were in power. Probably not all were Firangis either. Many of them could have Asian travellers including Muslims from other parts of the world. As I said, no one here has seen the evidence on record with the courts so let's not judge sitting here.

However, one can read the 1045 page judgement and then perhaps we can discuss.