Al Jazeera Pays Price for Showing Wrong Map of India

[janon]

Are you kidding me!

No.

 

[Dalit]

Its called might..get used to it.

Don't even make me laugh. Pathetic insecure Indians... It's always the world's fault.

 

[janon]

Don't even make me laugh. Pathetic insecure Indians... It's always the world's fault.

No, it's Al Jazeera's fault. Which is why they are being penalized. Not the whole world.

 

[Dalit]

No, it's Al Jazeera's fault. Which is why they are being penalized. Not the whole world.

Like it is BBC's fault for publishing the rape documentary... The world is conspiring and undermining India. Don't believe me? Read the comments of your fellow countrymen on this forum as well as the WWW.

 

[I.R.A]

They are being punished for showing the truth.

 

[janon]

Like it is BBC's fault for publishing the rape documentary... The world is conspiring and undermining India. Don't believe me? Read the comments of your fellow countrymen on this forum as well as the WWW.

Well yes, it's always the publisher's "fault" for publishing something. In the case of the rape documentary, I am of the opinion that it should not have been censored. If AJ showed a wrong map, of course it's their fault, who else do you think should be faulted for that? Doordarshan?

 

[Ryuzaki]

Banned for only 5 days? Bummer

 

[DeathInvader]

Any more channels in the line? When will BBC be banned for showing Nirbhaya documentary.

 

[Dalit]

Well yes, it's always the publisher's "fault" for publishing something. In the case of the rape documentary, I am of the opinion that it should not have been censored. If AJ showed a wrong map, of course it's their fault, who else do you think should be faulted for that? Doordarshan?

Like I said, whatever keeps you happy...

 

[nair]

Nothing wrong...... At times you need harsh measures to convey a message....... But the bigger question is, How much viewership this channel really has .....

 

[janon]

Like I said, whatever keeps you happy...

So you didn't really have anything substantial to say, in the first place. All right.

They are being punished for showing the truth.

The truth is that Indian Kashmir is in India.

 

[I.R.A]

The truth is that Indian Kashmir is in India.

The truth is Pakistani flag waves in Indian Occupied Kashmir every now and then.

 

[Bornubus]

This channel was already Stinking of Al Qaeda plus a disgusting Name

Good Punishment

 

[janon]

The truth is Pakistani flag waves in Indian Occupied Kashmir every now and then.

So? That doesn't mean that the area is Pakistani. I can go there without a visa; you can't.

An attention whore taking advantage of the freedom of expression in India and waving a flag, doesn't mean that the area is not Indian. If you want it, come and try to take it.

This channel was already Stinking Stinking of Al Qaeda plus a disgusting Name

Good Punishment

What's disgusting about the name?

 

[Faiez]

Wrong. They would take action, if it was done by a news organization. American law differentiates between "news" and "commentary". If a media organization is registered as a news organization, they are bound not to spread misinformation. If it is commentary, you are free to lie. That is why they make a legal distinction between political reporters and political commentators, for example.

There is no such law.