What's new

After Cancelling India Summit, Chinese Regime Says India Did It

We could draw any conclusion & what they are will depend upon which country we are from. VoA is not the only independent media organisation. This is what FT had to say.
India and China cancel border talks - FT.com

He is not about the actual intent of the article, he is in his think tank capacity about furiously coming out with nuances that best deflect the intent from what even a kid would derive from the article. 'China is lying to its people to show that it was India's fault as the reason behind the cancellation'. he does not get it - why? he is much too beholden to the chinese and so he does this over and over again here... what I call a " mental block to the obvious"
 
Where exactly did I claim that India wants to "rule over SCS"?



Try forming a coherent thought instead of blabbering away because your main point has been demolished. As for ridiculous assertions like "VOA is an aggregator", given that two hours ago you didn't even know what VOA was, I won't even waste my time.



I wouldn't apply to the psychic network if I were you.

1. you ranted on and on w/ me few weeks ago -about how India is looking to get with US and aus in a military alliance because India wants to rule over S china sea.
2. Because I did not get VOA abbreviation you used at first , does not mean I could not have caught on. But it still means that you have no clue that VOA is aggregrator of News. selected and chosen news but all the same aggregrator of the news.
 
Correct, but the point was to negate the OP's contention that "everywhere outside China" the blame was put on China and Chinese media was lying to their people.

this is a classic example of why I say he is about picking up on nunaces rather than intent.

The OP's contention ( that being moi) was that China lies to its people about the reason for the cancellation. Does not tell its people the real reason behind it. The OP was pasting of an article about it. But he refuses to the forrest and focuses on a tree.

He is the kind of guy who if he reads "India hops over Pakistan in the world stage".. would go " that contention is lie, a country can't 'hop over' , it's not a living object" i.e. The intent would be missed to nuanced approach.
 
1. you ranted on and on w/ me few weeks ago -about how India is looking to get with US and aus in a military alliance because India wants to rule over S china sea.

More English comprehension troubles for you.

The term "deputy sheriff" is a derogatory term, in case you missed it. It doesn't imply ruling anything.

2. Because I did not get VOA abbreviation you used at first , does not mean I could not have caught on. But it still means that you have no clue that VOA is aggregrator of News. selected and chosen news but all the same aggregrator of the news.

You're right. Voice of America, whose whole purpose is to be a propaganda arm of the US government, "aggregagtes" news from Chinese media. :rofl:

Hint: the article was written in New Delhi by a VOA journalist. An Indian lady. And it utterly destroys the premise of your thread.
 
Make Roybot a Think tank he has very intelligent posts and hes not a conspiracist who thinks the western world is launching a crusade into India and that everybody is against indians or hindus;)

Of course im biased because im his freind but he must be good if i like him;)
 
Oh not the white thing again.

What is with some chinese members on this forum and white people.

Nothing with white people, I am simply meaning that white Americans = long term, beyond 2nd generation, English speaking Europeans with US citizenship who make up the dominant (by far) political, economic and military leadership in the US.
 
Superpower China's visa acceptance rate to the US is lower than Papua New Guinea, Panama, Mozambique, Swaziland and Barbados. Glad you could make it to the "white man's" land.:lol:

Barbados is extremely rich.

That's OK, we're in the same league as some mid tier European countries like Slovakia (11%) and Serbia (14%).
 
More English comprehension troubles for you.

The term "deputy sheriff" is a derogatory term, in case you missed it. It doesn't imply ruling anything.



You're right. Voice of America, whose whole purpose is to be a propaganda arm of the US government, "aggregagtes" news from Chinese media. :rofl:

Hint: the article was written in New Delhi by a VOA journalist. An Indian lady. And it utterly destroys the premise of your thread.

how old are you? deputy sheriff blah blah , what is this suposed to be some insult ( is that some street lingo we are supposed to know?)? an insult is - asking people what comes first to ones mind when they hear the name pakistan ( ask around in australia too- word association is great game)

premise of my post was china's lying about the intent for internal consumption. It is only you who insisted that rhe premise was otherwise !

And other than you , your minority ilk--- no one actually thinks you have destroyed that premise on the world stage. you are party of two ( chinese and fellow pakistanis ) in this world rodeo.
 
how old are you? deputy sheriff blah blah , what is this suposed to be some insult ( is that some street lingo we are supposed to know?)? an insult is - asking people what comes first to ones mind when they hear the name pakistan ( ask around in australia too- word association is great game)

premise of my post was china's lying about the intent for internal consumption, other than you , your minority ilk--- you actually think have destroyed that premise on the world stage. you are party of two ( chinese and fellow pakistanis ) in this world rodeo.

Wow, you have serious problems - A Pakistani or Chinese must have stolen your girlfriend for you, to be this bitter and twisted - have a beer and chill, this much hatred is not good for your health.
 
That excuse has far outstripped its sell by date.Your attitude cannot be directly correlated to just the past comments of a few, however unpleasant those might have been. There is something far more latent, something that should not need a fig leaf of an excuse if it is brave enough to stand. We can all chose to take offense at anything & then proceed to tar everyone with the same brush. There are plenty of us on the other side who refrain from generalisations regardless of the abuse directed either from your countrymen or from the Pakistanis. There are others who take offense & act accordingly. The choice is that of the individual, it is your prerogative to choose which side of the line you want to stand but it is quite simply an example of extreme cowardice to hide behind that sorry excuse that you trot out once in a while to remind us that you were once a nice fella... It cuts no ice with anybody on this side, not anymore.At the very least, have the testicular fortitude to stand up & own your position, we have plenty of cowards here already. There is no pressing need to add your moniker to that sad list.

Post of the day I think.
 
International relations are always complex. The topic is about who pulled the trigger, not why. Both sides have issues with each other, but one side decided to walk away from the table.

u again betray your self-contradictions and mental gymnastics in pleasing up your masters...

your answer to the second part is the bolded part...there can be no simple conclusion as you would want us to believe.....we walked away because they made some really atrocious and childish demands which cant be entertained..

if i come to your house, your door is locked and i walk away who is responsible for me walking away...? you..not me...
 
u again betray your self-contradictions and mental gymnastics in pleasing up your masters...

your answer to the second part is the bolded part...there can be no simple conclusion as you would want us to believe.....we walked away because they made some really atrocious and childish demands which cant be entertained..

if i come to your house, your door is locked and i walk away who is responsible for me walking away...? you..not me...

It is almost borderline scary how he kept on insisting- that his version of what he thought the premise was , was mine too.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 2, Members: 0, Guests: 2)


Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom