U.S. Citizen getting visa to India needs no confusion. More than a thousand U.S. tourists visit India every day.
US citizens with pakistani heritage do not get Indian visas.
If you are wondering why, look up David Coleman Headley.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
U.S. Citizen getting visa to India needs no confusion. More than a thousand U.S. tourists visit India every day.
That’s true when Islamic invaders invaded them they accepted islam tomorrow if hindus invade them they will accept hinduism , If Christians then christianity , if chinese then they will become atheist , Buddhists Taoists etcDon't take it to heart, if you invade Punjab from the east, they will revert back to Hinduism and Sikhism just as easily. A trial run proved this concept in '47, whereby many a woman and girls were left behind and duly reverted back to Sikhism.
Then how come Pakistan has lower average life expectancy , Higher infant and maternal mortality rate , low per capita consumption of power , fuel , Two Wheelers and 4 wheelers , Air Passenger traffic at Pakistani airports is also very low compared to Indian airportsThat is the correct analysis.
Pakistan is a poor country of rich people.
India is a rich country of poor people.
Our black economy is many times the size of the documented white economy.
An ill managed, ill engineered economy, which if managed right could put neighbors to shame.
He may be saying that the absolute number of poor people is less in Pakistan than in India. That makes sense since India is so much larger. So, both can be true. Pakistan does have fewer number of poor people than India and is also a poorer country.Then how come Pakistan has lower average life expectancy , Higher infant and maternal mortality rate , low per capita consumption of power , fuel , Two Wheelers and 4 wheelers , Air Passenger traffic at Pakistani airports is also very low compared to Indian airports
If people are rich they would consume more , eat healthy , have better access to healthcare services , live longer
India is a democracy , leaders of all parties are involved in settling illegal slums in planned urban cities , no officer can demolish such illegal colonies because of vote powerc these slums carry, kejriwal is cashing on vote from these slums by giving free education and free electricity free hospitals , now from last three covid years they are getting free rations also .He may be saying that the absolute number of poor people is less in Pakistan than in India. That makes sense since India is so much larger. So, both can be true. Pakistan does have fewer number of poor people than India and is also a poorer country.
That doesn't explain why the illegal slums can't be replaced by low-cost tenements publicly. Even something like:India is a democracy , leaders of all parties are involved in settling illegal slums in planned urban cities , no officer can demolish such illegal colonies because of vote powerc these slums carry, kejriwal is cashing on vote from these slums by giving free education and free electricity free hospitals , now from last three covid years they are getting free rations also .
Don't take it to heart, if you invade Punjab from the east, they will revert back to Hinduism and Sikhism just as easily. A trial run proved this concept in '47, whereby many a woman and girls were left behind and duly reverted back to Sikhism.
It's worth noting that the elites in Pakistan aren't the same ones who led the land at the time of the Arabs, Delhi Sultanate, or Mughals. Those elites were killed off by the British and replaced with tier-2 and tier-3 people. Those guys will do whatever it takes to get power.That’s true when Islamic invaders invaded them they accepted islam tomorrow if hindus invade them they will accept hinduism , If Christians then christianity , if chinese then they will become atheist , Buddhists Taoists etc
That doesn't explain why the illegal slums can't be replaced by low-cost tenements publicly. Even something like:
![]()
would be improvement. These can be manufactured in India for say, $3,000 i.e., 300,000 rupees.
qz.com
There were plenty of people from Central Asia who were coming to Northwest India and Delhi to make a name for themselves before the Mongol invasions as well as post Mongol invasions. He could easily have been one of those unknown people.Nope - tughlaqnama is the original source and he was born in Punjab around dipalpur area according to amir khusro who wrote his biography when he was alive
Even if he was carried to the throne by Khokhars, it doesn't in anyway prove that he was a Khokhar. As I have previously mentioned, Rajputs had a strong influence on who will come on the Mughal throne. Sons of Mughals used to vie Rajput rulers to get their support for the throne.This is where you are wrong
What's 100% true is that he was carried to his throne by khokhar tribesmen - that's not contested by anyone
If the climate didn't favor them how did they become powerful enough to literally change a King of the Delhi sultanate without any involvement from Turks, Persians, mongols etc - makes no sense
I have no idea why Amir Khusrow wrote in Punjabi to honor his victory but I'm pretty sure that there will be plenty of Persian accounts of him as well.Amir khusro was a Persian, Punjabi was far from his language, according to you Ghazi Malik was Turk or something
First vaar poem that amir khusro wrote to honor his victory was in Punjabi - why would he do that
You're marahati, your poet is a Persian, your court language is Tamil
First poem to honor you - is in bangali - does that make any sense to you?
Btw court language doesn't matter, Persian was court language of every empire for so long even non Muslim one's sometimes
Assumptions. I would have agreed if you gave me a good source.He was born in dipalpur or that general area according to tughlaqnama - no turk tribe was living there except for punjabi tribes, turk tribes only mixed into Afghanistan that too much later than the time period of Malik
So that tribe had to be a native tribe, as no other tribe existed in that general region - his tribe wasn't mentioned cause it was not a powerful clan and probably died - 100s of clans have died out in the region so that's not exactly weird
Didn't read all of it butThere were plenty of people from Central Asia who were coming to Northwest India and Delhi to make a name for themselves before the Mongol invasions as well as post Mongol invasions. He could easily have been one of those unknown people.
Even if he was carried to the throne by Khokhars, it doesn't in anyway prove that he was a Khokhar. As I have previously mentioned, Rajputs had a strong influence on who will come on the Mughal throne. Sons of Mughals used to vie Rajput rulers to get their support for the throne.
I have no idea why Amir Khusrow wrote in Punjabi to honor his victory but I'm pretty sure that there will be plenty of Persian accounts of him as well.
No, many non-Muslim empires had their own local court language. The court language of Vijaynagara empire for instance, was Kannada and Telugu. The court language of the Maratha empire was Marathi while that of the Ahom empire was Ahom. Non-Muslims tended to be more rooted to their land and proud about their own culture and language which continues to present day.
Assumptions. I would have agreed if you gave me a good source.
Take, for example, the Mughals. They are pretty clear where they came from. It's the same with the Rajputs, the Marathas, the rulers of the Vijaynagar empire. Hence, we are pretty sure about who the founding ruler was. However, with lack of evidence, and considering those times (13th-14th century), it is highly unlikely that the Turks and Persians would have allowed a Hind Muslim on the Delhi throne. The Delhi Sultanate were either fighting other Muslim kings of non-Indian origin or non-Muslim kings of Indian origin. Indian Muslims didn't have a great track record of forming their own empire.
Let's end it here. You are beating a dead horse.