tanlixiang28776
SENIOR MEMBER
That would be from the Billingsgate Market.
You seem to have spend quite some time there it appears.
Nope only been in America and China.
But maybe I'm just that damn good.

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
That would be from the Billingsgate Market.
You seem to have spend quite some time there it appears.

U actually misunderstood me,I was not implying that these r great cities,but rather trying to say that we should not depend on the legacy of British and develop our cities as much as we can.
You haven't been on this forum long have you?
Seems Mumbai and Delhi r not that behind of ur premier cities,in turn ahead of many cities

I dont want to spend my precious time reading threads which in itself is BS and the posters discussing something not remotely related to the purpose with which the thread was started in first place.
Why dont u guyz/gals stop the nonsensical posts in this thread ?
LOL!
Look at the GDP per capita of Hong Kong, Shanghai and Beijing... and compare them with the GDP per capita of Delhi and Mumbai.
What you're doing, is squeezing a ridiculous amount of people into those cities, which means that there is a huge difference in population. You are trying to frame your argument in such a way that allows you to make something of a comparison. So you're trying to be clever, but failing.
We've all seen what Shanghai and Hong Kong look like, and we've all seen what Mumbai and Delhi look like.



Why always compare just GDP per capita because that speak in ur favour,selective filtering to appese ur personal intention's,in thet case Luxumberg and geneva have double the GDP of ur cities,so that make those nation's much greater,bigger and powerful than ur nation,just like i told before u can cry allday when something is not in ur favour.
LOL!
I guess you will finally realize why your neighbours (China/Pakistan/Sri Lanka/Nepal/Bangladesh) don't like it when Indians lecture them. Throwing stones in a glass house.




We're talking cities here, not countries.
Why always compare just GDP per capita because that speak in ur favour,selective filtering to appese ur personal intention's,in thet case Luxumberg and geneva have double the GDP of ur cities,so that make those nation's much greater,bigger and powerful than ur nation,just like i told before u can cry allday when something is not in ur favour.
The difference is, that I will always readily admit that China is NOT a "developed" country. In fact I have always said that I do not want China to be a "superpower", EVER. Whether in ten years, fifty years or even a hundred years from now.
But it is annoying to have "developing countries" like India, who are FAR more worse off, to lecture us on democracy.
Especially when I'm living in a "non-democratic" place like Hong Kong, and having Indians trying to lecture me on democracy.
Geneva is a country?
who tried to lecture here u on democracy,if u like to live in a communist state that ur choice,we have no problem in it
Such statements appear when some of ur compatriots try to act smart trying to make fun of democracy,given more nation's had accepted democracy as the governance model rather than communism,and u people not used to democacy,it also irks as when u people arrive with ur expert comments about democracy.
You were talking about how because those countries have higher GDP per capita they should be more powerful then China.
I live in a democracy and I can say it is great. But thats because its American democracy that works well. I don't know much about Indian democracy but from the way India is today it is not something to be admired.