usa
russia
china
france
turky
india
pakistan
south korea
japan
italy
germany
saudiarabia
egypt
taiwan ROC
uk
greece
No buddy you are wrong India deserve last place and Pakistan top
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
usa
russia
china
france
turky
india
pakistan
south korea
japan
italy
germany
saudiarabia
egypt
taiwan ROC
uk
greece
USA 1
China 2
Russia 3
India 4
I stopped watching at that point....... can anyone tell if PAF was included in top 30 please? thanks in advance


You have played with the figures very nicely, nice try bro, next time please quote the sources also, if it is in Janes please quote from their directly not write the numbers yourself
No buddy you are wrong India deserve last place and Pakistan top

Give one good reason for your cumbersome judgement.
The retrospect argument surrounds the quantitative figures and not qualitative achievements, hence the topic doesn't demean any one or other air arm.
Yaar, why don't you understand, it was a report in the Sunday Times which gave a reference to Jane's Defence.
It's not a break down of a numerical game or break down of every air force in the world. Just a few example were given as a comparison.
The best i could do was to scan and post the whole article, which in any case was focused on the UK Defence cuts.l
Dear Windjammer,
I am highly surprised that ur Thread is still not being deleted by ur friends(MODs)...You named a reputed defence site without their link.You can't even show any link of this story in any newspaper.How can ppl believe that its not your own imaginative number?
However whats the purpose of this thread??We all already know all the numbers(near accurate) from different sources.What more your thread contributing with your hand written numbers??
Where r all great adimns??Huh..
The best i could do was to scan and post the whole article

Not even this
![]()

Listen up, since you are incompetent to lend any substance to your pathetic argument, hence,
You will leave no runner ups in the nit pick race.
Read and comprehend to what i stated.
The best i could do was to scan and post the whole article, which in any case was focused on the UK Defence cuts.
You surely need spoon feeding.![]()
You could do it at ist place itself..
If not u r a Pakistani, your thread would have been deleted long back, because there's no link, no source you provided, and you can't think ppl would take ur words of mouth as words written on wall...Right?
As I said your thread don't contribute anything extra with ur hand written words..What's the usefulness of creating a fresh new thread with ur hand written numbers?
Listen kid, barely two months into the forum and you are already questioning the credibility of the MODS, making frivlious remarks and commenting on the subject without any hint of knowledge and substance. Learn to crawl before you aim to walk, what to say of you trying to run the show.
The existence of your thread alive still itself says it all..
huh..u don't need to send thousands of messages for understanding the subject .By the way, u didn't answer any of my questions.
