Wrong, try again.Wrong and Fake news this banner is from last year which was showing the intended number of JF-17 in total PAF wanted to induct but now they have decided to have at least 250 of these beasts
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Wrong, try again.Wrong and Fake news this banner is from last year which was showing the intended number of JF-17 in total PAF wanted to induct but now they have decided to have at least 250 of these beasts
or may be 150th sortie of this pilot on this thunderLau--Kar lo gul---Gul eee muka chhaddi aiy---.
That is what it was---150 sorties
Hi,
Paf was offered 18 J10B's---Paf refused.
Yes Back to future, an old banner with 2018 markings.Wrong and Fake news this banner is from last year which was showing the intended number of JF-17 in total PAF wanted to induct but now they have decided to have at least 250 of these beasts

YehSo the given JF-17s are all Block-I?
100th JF-17 rolled out in December 2017 (ACM at rolling out ceremony of 100th JF17 - Pakistan Defence) and in April 2018, 150th!!!!50 jets in 4 Months!!!??
Either PAC was hiding the real production capacity since 2009 OR this news is fake??
Please enlighten!!!!
He looks very much like an engineer in the pic. 150 sorties might be monumental if they're considering the Thunders to be flying coffins. It could be some other event or highlight....but from what ive seen recently is that PAF/PAC always over do it when it comes to achievements.or may be 150th sortie of this pilot on this thunder
He looks very much like an engineer in the pic. 150 sorties might be monumental if they're considering the Thunders to be flying coffins. It could be some other event or highlight....but from what ive seen recently is that PAF/PAC always over do it when it comes to achievements.
My good sir....I know PAF a little bit differently than you would happen to know. I wish you were there for the PAC presentation that I went for....and this criticism is simply for them to work on certain things....that is all. Cheers !!!IS that why people here are guessing what is the reason behind the subject image, why PAF never discloses it’s operations even doesn’t discuss it’s participation in international exercises or their outcome, and like Western airforces , never seen any PAF aircraft supporting silhouettes of the likes of Typhoons or Eagles it managed to shoot down during some of these exercises, but yea, PAF overdoes it’s achievements.
My dear, healthy criticism is good indeed but taking pot shots is totally unproductive, something also advised by a well known former A/C.My good sir....I know PAF a little bit differently than you would happen to know. I wish you were there for the PAC presentation that I went for....and this criticism is simply for them to work on certain things....that is all. Cheers !!!
And for knowledge purposes, in exercises you do not have aircraft exhibiting silhouettes of other aircraft they have shot down. I don't know what was being highlighted by that comment.
I understand. You have your opinions....I have mine. A former A/C may advise it...but most recent ACM welcomes it from when we last spoke around 55 mins ago. Take care Windjammer.My dear, healthy criticism is good indeed but taking pot shots is totally unproductive, something also advised by a well known former A/C.
As for second part, i said, if the PAF went overboard, it would indulge in chest thumping like air arms in our neighbourhood or simply portray it's achievements on it's aircraft like some others do.....this Italian Typhoon being a prime example.
View attachment 466099
![]()