What's new

10 charts that reveal Australians' views on world affairs

Raphael

SENIOR MEMBER
Mar 1, 2012
3,286
5
9,618
Country
China
Location
China
10 charts that reveal Australians' views on world affairs - ABC News (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)

The 2014 ANUpoll on Foreign Policy finds strong support for Australia's alliance with the United States, though a majority of Australians see our relationship with China as equally or more important.

US alliance remains popular
In recent days, Prime Minister Tony Abbott has agreed to a United States request for help to transport military equipment into northern Iraq. The ANUpoll finds Australians maintain strong support for the ANZUS alliance, with 81 per cent saying it is very important or fairly important to Australia's interests.

That figure is down a modest five points over the past 12 months.

Charles Miller from the ANU College of Asia and the Pacific says the finding is no surprise, with surveys since the 1990s consistently showing the alliance retains the support of a substantial number of Australians.

"I would expect that this will continue to be the case for the foreseeable future absent some truly wildcard event," he said.

importance-of-us-alliance-data.gif

Minority view China as military threat
chart-china-threat-australia-data.gif

Australia's relationship with China has also been in the spotlight recently, after Palmer United Party (PUP) leader Clive Palmer launched a scathing attack on the Chinese government, labelling them mongrels who shoot their own people. He subsequently apologised, but Tasmanian PUP Senator Jacqui Lambie refused to back down over her suggestions that China could invade Australia.

More than half of those polled by the ANU see China as an economic threat, but only three in 10 agree with Senator Lambie that it is a military threat.

"The 30 per cent of respondents who consider China to be a military threat appears to be a little lower than in similar polls conducted by the AES and Lowy recently, which found the corresponding figure to be over 50 per cent and over 40 per cent respectively," Dr Miller said.

"However, I think the difference lies more in the question wording – AES for instance ask whether China is likely to be a security threat, a broader term than this poll, which asks whether it is a military threat.

"Overall, the perception that China is a potential security threat to Australia has been subtly rising in recent years relative to the early 2000s, when most people's minds were on the threat from Islamist terrorism. However, this runs counter to the consensus amongst security experts, most of whom agree China is not a current threat."

chart-china-growth-data.gif

Overall, a strong majority of poll respondents say China's growth is a positive development for Australia.

Andrew Carr from ANU's School of International Political and Strategic Studies says Australians are "rightly welcoming" of China's economic rise and "this is for the moment more important for them than any long-term risks it may present".

The poll finds Australians are evenly divided on whether the US or China is more important to Australia's interests, a finding the leader of the ANUpoll project, Ian McAllister, says highlights a key foreign policy challenge for Australia.

"Maintaining the delicate balance between Australia's long-term security alliance with the USA and Australia's trade links with China is perhaps the greatest foreign policy challenge for any Australian government," Professor McAllister said.

chart-us-china-australia-data.gif

Indonesia seen as 'a friend, not an ally'
chart-indonesia-relations-data.gif

A majority of respondents see Indonesia as a friend of Australia but not an ally, and six in 10 Australians believe Indonesia has not assisted Australia's efforts to combat people-smuggling.

"The public's wariness towards Indonesia is partly based on the perception that Indonesia has not assisted Australia on reducing terrorism and in combating people smuggling," Professor McAllister said.

chart-indonesia-relations-data.gif

Foreign aid support dips
Support for Australia's foreign aid program has slipped, but remains strong at 75 per cent, down by 10 points since 2001.

"Support for humanitarian aid is softening generally but Australians still prefer humanitarian aid over aid for political or commercial ends," said Jill Sheppard from the ANU School of Politics and International Relations.

chart-foreign-aid-data.gif
chart-foreign-aid-data.gif

Australians retain favourable view of UN
The poll also examined Australians' views on a range of other international institutions, finding views of the United Nations were strongly favourable. However, other key bodies including the World Health Organisation, World Bank and World Trade Organisation did not engender the same levels of trust.

confidence-in-united-nations-data.gif
confidence-in-international-institutions-data.gif
 
Australians retain favourable view of UN
The poll also examined Australians' views on a range of other international institutions, finding views of the United Nations were strongly favourable. However, other key bodies including the World Health Organisation, World Bank and World Trade Organisation did not engender the same levels of trust.

confidence-in-united-nations-data.gif
confidence-in-international-institutions-data.gif

Very informative post, thanks. I am surprised by the confidence in the UN, and I wonder what accounts for it. Meanwhile, in the US:

v5x_mpp7hksgs5f9peo5lg.png
 
Very informative post, thanks. I am surprised by the confidence in the UN, and I wonder what accounts for it. Meanwhile, in the US:

The vast majority of the world likes the UN. I wager that Americans are an exception because:

1. America is strong enough to act unilaterally, likes to unilaterally, and doesn't like to be restrained by the granddaddy of all multilateral institutions, the UN.
2. The pro-Israeli media resents the perceived anti-Israel bias of the UN, and thus intentionally fans up anti-UN sentiment.
 
The vast majority of the world likes the UN. I wager that Americans are an exception because:

1. America is strong enough to act unilaterally, likes to unilaterally, and doesn't like to be restrained by the granddaddy of all multilateral institutions, the UN.
2. The pro-Israeli media resents the perceived anti-Israel bias of the UN, and thus intentionally fans up anti-UN sentiment.

That's an interesting perspective. There are far more straightfoward explanations, however:

1) The UN was set up in the image of the US, to reflect US values of human rights, freedom, and respect for property. In reality, it became a forum for the NAM and the OIC to bash the West and undermine--and even parody--the values of human rights, freedom, and respect for property. And yes, this includes the disproportionate focus on Israel, which in itself demonstrates the uselessness of the UN.

2) The US funds a fifth of the UN, but derives nearly no value from it (we don't partake of its health, cultural, or peacekeeping services to any significant degree). No value for the money, especially because the UN occupies a tremendously valuable piece of land in Manhattan.

3) Diplomats who have immunity through the UN abuse their privileges egregiously, from unpaid parking tickets to keeping slaves on US soil.

4) To paraphrase Stalin, how many divisions does the UN have? More often than not, we have to save UN forces, instead of vice versa. When we're not saving UN forces, they're busy raping the locals, stealing their possessions, and skimming aid to line their own pockets.

In conclusion, the UN is a wonderful institution, and I can see why the rest of the world has so much faith in it; we Americans must be truly deluded not to love it as the paragon of virtue that it is.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 1, Members: 0, Guests: 1)


Back
Top Bottom